Factors that influence cognitive presence: A scoping review
Keywords:online learning, cognitive presence, higher-order thinking, community of inquiry, scoping review
The gradual shift to online modes of learning in higher education institutions over the past 2 decades accelerated drastically on a global scale between 2020 and 2022. Students and educators, who have initially grappled with the shift, have now become accustomed to online teaching; however, there are concerns about the quality of learning that has resulted. To enable a sustainable and effective online pedagogy, educators may need to learn about fostering higher-order thinking skills, which can be challenging even for experienced educators. To conceptualise effective online pedagogy, the community of inquiry (CoI) framework emphasises cognitive presence (CP), which focuses on the higher-order thinking process. The CoI is the most widely researched framework in online pedagogy, yet contemporary CoI literature lacks collective evidence of factors that influence CP. This scoping review of the CoI literature explores the factors that influence the higher-order thinking that is indicative of CP. Inclusion criteria included evidence of CP in online learning contexts and published between January 2000 and March 2022, providing a total of 121 studies. Results suggest that teaching presence, structure of learning activities and student characteristics all influence CP.
Implications for practice or policy:
- Higher education students enrolled in online courses should be taught how to learn effectively in an online mode.
- Online course educators must embed learning tasks that foster self-regulation and higher-order skills in students.
- Online course design should include authentic tasks for students to apply new knowledge to real-life scenarios.
- Educators must be offered ample professional development activities to build their skills in online pedagogy.
- Institutions should encourage translation of online educational research to practice.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Sandhya Maranna, John Willison, Srecko Joksimovic, Nayana Parange, Maurizio Costabile
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant AJET right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in AJET volumes 36 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.