Editorial 32(4): An argument for research significance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3434Keywords:
criticism of educational technologyAbstract
A recurring theme in the criticism of research relating to educational technology is that the field is swamped by descriptive studies. This work often does not provide for generalisation to population or theory, and rarely adds to our understanding of how the educational technology application or practices can be understood in terms of other contexts. Arguably, it is not sufficient to simply demonstrate that an effect was observed in response to an educational technology practice. There is an onus on researchers to consider how their findings are significant beyond the confines of their study.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Downloads
Published
2016-11-07
How to Cite
Henderson, M., Heinrich, E., & Lee, C. B. (2016). Editorial 32(4): An argument for research significance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3434
Issue
Section
Editorial
License
Articles published in the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant AJET right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
This copyright notice applies to articles published in AJET volumes 36 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.