Blended learning in design education: An analysis of students' experiences within the disciplinary differences framework

  • Sule Tasli Pektas Bilkent University
  • Meltem O. Gurel Bilkent University

Abstract

Blended learning has already become an indispensable part of education in many fields. However, the majority of existing research on blended learning has assumed homogeneity of disciplines. This study suggests that research highlighting disciplinary effects and differences is much needed to effectively develop courses and tools consonant with the characteristics of each discipline. To help close this research gap, this paper focuses on design education and analyses student experiences in a “blended design studio” that combined the Moodle learning management system, live videoconferencing, and social networking media (Facebook) with traditional face-to-face learning (design studio). Students’ perceptions of the methods and tools were elicited through structured and open-ended questions and qualitative variations in responses were categorised. Subsequent quantitative analysis revealed that the characteristics of soft-applied fields require customisation in blended courses and educational system designs in several ways.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Sule Tasli Pektas, Bilkent University

Dr. Şule Taşlı Pektaş, Assist. Prof. Dr., Bilkent University, Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture, 06800, Bilkent/Ankara, Turkey

Email: tasli@bilkent.edu.tr

Web: http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~tasli/

Meltem O. Gurel, Bilkent University

Dr. Meltem O. Gürel, Assist. Prof. Dr., Bilkent University, Faculty of Art, Design and Architecture, 06800, Bilkent/Ankara, Turkey

Email: mogurel@bilkent.edu.tr

Published
2014-03-24
How to Cite
Pektas, S. T., & Gurel, M. O. (2014). Blended learning in design education: An analysis of students’ experiences within the disciplinary differences framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.372