Measuring participant performance: An alternative

Authors

  • Susan Bumpass Professional Education Division Arthur Andersen and Co
  • David Wade Professional Education Division Arthur Andersen and Co

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2321

Abstract

This article presents the reasons for having faculty appraise participant performance during training. A methodology used to develop such an appraisal is explained and a sample of the behavioural description used is provided. The preliminary results suggest that faculty appraisal of participants' performance during training is a useful evaluation alternative.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

1990-12-01

How to Cite

Bumpass, S., & Wade, D. (1990). Measuring participant performance: An alternative. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2321

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (1990): Australian Journal of Educational Technology

Section

Articles

License

Articles published in the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (AJET) are available under Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). Authors retain copyright in their work and grant AJET right of first publication under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

This copyright notice applies to articles published in AJET volumes 36 onwards. Please read about the copyright notices for previous volumes under Journal History.